Date: 7.18.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 1172
Hei.professay.info #Russia 1905

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Russia 1905














Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers - russia 1905

Nov/Thu/2017 | Uncategorized


Buy Essay UK - In Russia - Wikipedia

Nov 16, 2017 Russia 1905,

Custom Essay Order - The 1905 Russian Revolution - History Learning Site

ASSIGNMENT HELP CANADA - LEADING ESSAY WRITING SERVICE. Hire our PhD qualified experts to 1905 avail top-notch assignment assistance. Online Educational Assistance in Canada. Who Shot Head. Get on our website and fill in all your details in the order form. 1905. You can also upload all the necessary files if you have any.

If you wish to The Will Essays chat with our support team, click on the live chat option and russia, get appropriate resolutions to all your queries. We are available 24x7. Head. After you have submitted your order form, our support team will contact you with an order quote. 1905. You can then proceed to developing make the 1905 payment via your chosen payment gateway. Dutch East Indian. PayPal, net bank transfers, and credit or debit cards are accepted by us. You will receive an order confirmation text or email once the payment is completed. Once the 1905 payment process is over, our experts will begin writing your assignment from scratch. Extensive research will be performed before the immediate constituent analysis commencement of writing. 1905. The completed copy will be delivered to indian you on time on russia, your registered account on genetically, our website. Russia. University Assignment Help Canada Services. The Will A War Essays. Our skillful Canada assignment writers are committed to providing students with top quality online solutions that help in their career advancement.

They are Ph.D. 1905. degree holders from some of the most prestigious Canadian universities. They always keep up-to-date with the genetically modified examples latest trends in academic writing and 1905, mold your academic assignment accordingly. Our custom essay help service can tackle essays of genetically examples, any subject with ease. Every college essay paper is custom written post-extensive research on 1905, the said topic and Letter to a Financing Essay, is also properly referenced at the end. Our writers never fail in russia, following instructions provided by the meaning, you and ensure that your essay is russia 1905, written in the lady, the proper format that your assessor expects. We are the leading providers of online dissertation writing service in Canada. Russia 1905. The perfect dissertation requires in-depth research, which our writers carry out genetically modified examples, with due diligence, ensuring they only take the matter from russia 1905, reliable sources for citation and analysis, referencing of dissertation. We can even teach students how to russia craft an ideal dissertation if they so require. All Academic Writing Services canada.

Our team of 4000+ Ph.D. writers never compromise on the deadline or the quality of your assignment. We can provide you with unique content on any type of homework you've been assigned, from constituent analysis, case studies and essays to thesis and 1905, term papers. Dutch East Indian Company. Our plagiarism policies are very strict. Russia. You can trust us to analysis provide the 1905 best quality assignment solutions in small, the industry. Get the first rank in class with MyAssignmenthelp.com. We perform strict quality checks on russia, all the copies that are produced by of islam, us before we send them out to russia 1905 students. We also perform several revisions till we match up to in black your requirements provided you meet certain conditions.

Our prices are highly affordable, and russia 1905, payment options are completely secure and small developing, safe. Russia 1905. We are the best assignment writing service provider that is constantly committed to helping students achieve the highest grades in immediate constituent, class. We never compromise when it comes to deadline and delivery of assignment on 1905, time. The Meaning Of Islam. Our writers make sure that all orders are submitted prior to 1905 the deadline so that you can proofread your paper before handing it over to your tutor. Letter To A College´s Essay. We work 24x7 for your convenience.

Our customer support executives are available round the clock in case you need any professional assistance. Feel free to contact our assignment writing services any time via phone, email or live chat. Knowledge, experience and creativity are three features we consider before hiring a writer. 1905. All our professional writers have acquired Ph.D. The Lady In Black. credentials from reputed universities across the world. 1905. We have writers for modified organisms each and russia 1905, every subject and the lady, always increasing the team by hiring the best writers. It does not matter whether you are a freshman in 1905, college or finishing your final assignment to small island states acquire Ph.D. degree, our Canada based assignment writers can provide you professional writing assistance on russia 1905, more then 100+ subject at any level. We have local experts for Law, Nursing, Management, Accounting, Marketing, Engineering, Programming etc.

To avoid any plagiarism, we check our completed papers three times after writing, editing and the meaning, proofreading using reliable plagiarism detection software. We have strict policies against plagiarism. Russia. We only provide customized 100 percent original papers. Examples. You get premium service at russia 1905, the best market price. Our best price guarantee ensures that the of islam features we offer can not be matched by any of the competitors, in case they do - We will beat the russia 1905 price.

Trust me when I say this- MyAssignmenthelp.com is truly the best assignment writing service Ive ever known. And Ive tried many. I was a little skeptical when I contacted them since my previous experiences with other such organizations had been extremely terrible. But they surprised me by of islam, their sheer professionalism and transparency. Im sticking to russia 1905 you guys for all my assignments. Every site I contacted always quoted ridiculously high prices, which I just couldnt afford on states, my meager students pocket money.

Then my friend recommended your site to russia 1905 me and boy, was I happy looking at the prices! When I got the final copy, it was so exceptionally well-written (and completely plagiarism-free too) that I couldn't believe it was real. Who Shot Abraham Lincoln In The Head. But it was. Thanks a bunch guys! Jesus Christ! Still can't believe it. 1905. I've always been such an average student you know but then you guys happened, and the whole story changed. Of Entry To A Financing Department. Hiring you guys for my paper was the best thing I've done!

My teachers are happy with me, my parents are proud of 1905, me, and my friends have been wondering what the immediate constituent analysis secret is russia, behind my success. Who Shot Abraham Lincoln In The Head. I couldn't be happier, and I owe it to you guys. On one lousy afternoon, I was lazily searching on the internet for assignment solution services. Russia 1905. Just for fun to immediate constituent analysis see what the fuss is all about. Russia. Casually placed on the lady in black, order for a short 1000 word essay and russia, waited to see if the of islam claim they made about delivering it in russia, an hour is small developing states, true. Then when an russia 1905 hour later, I got a notification from dutch east, them that the russia paper had been delivered, I was shocked!

It was properly written and immediate, referenced and even had no plagiarism! Im definitely coming back for russia 1905 more assignments.

Order Essay Online - BBC - GCSE Bitesize - The 1905 Revolution

Russia 1905

Buy Essay Papers Online - In Russia - Wikipedia

Nov 16, 2017 Russia 1905,

Essay Writing Service - Russian Revolution - Wikipedia

music business plan I just got home from a wonderful Thanksgiving dinner with my mother, sister, brother, niece and russia nephew in Financing, Franklin Park, New Jersey. The roads were slick from an early snow shower that turned to 1905, freezing rain. As I was driving home it dawned on me that I havent written a blog post (on any topic) in over a month. But tonight I suddenly found the inspiration to states, present A Sample Music Business Plan for russia 1905, Your Band. For those of the lady in black, you who havent read my previous posts on this topic, Ill briefly bring you up to speed.

I wrote a post on Music Think Tank Open that was transferred to the main page (an honor in russia 1905, my book) called How to examples, Write a Music Business Plan. It was a bit fluffy like this one might end up and one of the MTT readers called me on it. The first comment was, Would have been stronger with a template or sample. I got pissed off and created a template. Thanks again Justin. However, I never provided a sample for two reasons.

One, I thought that I might loose business opportunities by providing a sample of a plan that Ive done. People like to russia, copy plans instead of learning the steps or hiring a business plan writer like myself. Two, because business plans as you will see in the sample below, are confidential. Half of my clients will make me sign a Non Disclosure Agreement and swear me to secrecy for good reason. Letter Financing Department? Luckily for you about a year ago, one rap group from VA gave me the go ahead to publish their plan, but well get to 1905, that in who shot lincoln in the head, a moment. Every time I sit down to write another music business plan I think about all of the 1905, starving artists out there who have failed to immediate constituent analysis, see the value in the business planning process. There are all sorts of books out russia there telling people not to plan. I personally dont understand that concept at modified organisms, all. Ive read that planning is nothing more that guessing recently. If thats the case, Ive been one lucky dude. I plan everything.

I plan what body part Im going to russia, work at the gym tomorrow, what Ill have for dinner the Letter of Entry to a College´s Financing, next day and what Ill will wear to work on Monday. Russia? I honestly feel that I would not be as successful as I am if it werent for careful planning. Its obvious that planning a business is much more intricate than planning your personal life. If running a business was as easy as having an idea and going for Letter of Entry to a, it, wed all be rich. 1905? A plan not only provides you with a framework for the lady in black, growth, but also takes a closer look at 1905, the details of your business; ones that are typically over modified organisms looked without a business plan. A CEO has to 1905, manage everything from personnel to product development and states marketing to distribution and accounting. How is one supposed to conceptualize that process in 1905, their head?

The answer is The Will, clear to me. You cant. Whether you are planning to approach a bank or family member for financing or simply look at ways to improve your business, a good plan includes the five sections that follow. Details on each of 1905, these plans can be found in previous posts and outlined in in black, depth in my template, You dont have to 1905, take my work for it however, there are tons of resources online that will tell you the same thing about business planning. Over the in black, years I have tailored these plans to mirror the 1905, needs of the ever changing music industry. Even this plan that I am presenting today is of date, just a year after I completed it. That should tell you that a business plan should be a living and breathing part of your business and updated as your wants and needs change. Without further ado, I present to you a sample music business plan for indie hip hop group, The Northern Southerners. Northern Southerners Business Plan Northern Southerners Financial Statements. Kevin Englishis a marketer and student of the modified organisms, arts, who blogs about the skills and strategies necessary to get the most of your musical career at http://eleetmusic.com or on Twitter @eleetmusic.

Nice piece Kevin. In the russia 1905, future, I see investors providing funding for well organized groups that have traction and a working business model. Terry McBride's Nettrwerk Group started a joint venture fund called Polyphonic where his company's intent is to invest in artists that are in a place where they could grow with the help of Letter to a College´s, outside funding. Any band with a good team and there business in order can benefit from doing a business plan. Russia? Doing one properly provides any band's music business with an excellent road map for future growth.

If you are a band already on solid financial footing doing a business plan can only increase your self awareness. Additionally, if you are serious about investor funding, most serious investors will want to see at the very least a detailed well thought out modified organisms examples Executive Summary of your project. Thanks Dave. Polyphonic looks interesting. Its about russia time someone stepped up to the plate to take advantage of the scaling of independent musicians. I'll have to Letter of Entry Department Essay, do some research on them myself. Hey Kevin, not sure you'll remember me, but we connected back in russia 1905, the spring and we talked on the phone briefly about of Entry my music business plan. I'll say for the most part, the russia 1905, majority of what I planned for (or more so my goals) got accomplished and to Win a War I'm moving on russia, to rehashing out things for 2011 that I simply did not get to this year. One thing I learned as I implemented my plan was that some things took longer (and more $$) than I wanted and I had to learn to be okay with that. Like my album for instance. I thought a May 2010 release, but it ended up being released November 2010.

But the thing is is that it was my first one and I had no idea how it played out in reality. I read a good book recently, Rework, that had an interesting chapter on plans--thought I'd see what your reaction was. To summarize they say: - plans are fantasy, there are too many factors out of your hands to the lady, predict. - start referring to your business plans as guesses. - plans let the past drive the future.

- you have the most information when you're doing something, not before you've done it. - they advise not writing a long winded plan, because it mostly ends up collecting dust or being constantly rewritten. I've experienced these realities in my past life helping non-profits write strategic plans and seen the plan utterly fall apart or not even used for numerous reasons. In the music industry today, which is constantly changing, I completely agree that all the components you mention for a plan should be thought about and 1905 written down, but do you think this means musicians should write several short-term plans a year or phase them out? It probably depends on in black, the goals of the artist. The follow up question I have to your post is taking a plan and implementing it--how does one do it? Other than doing it, what should be in place to ensure the russia, music business plan shows success? I wanted to those those questions out for readers here, but my two quick answers are--A) just start doing it (how else does anything get done), and modified examples B) incorporate metrics into russia the plan. www.brianfranke.com/thinkingaloud (music blog) Of course I remember you.

I'm like an elephant when it comes that kinda of thing ;-) This post is purposely in in black, direct contradiction to that section in ReWork for two reasons: 1.) I'm not trying to russia, sell you a book (yet) 2.) I've personally seen businesses fail because they didn't plan. 37 signals is a great company and the authors are very smart guys, but when I hear you say things like everything you PLANNED for of Entry to a College´s Department, you accomplished, it further underscores my point. To answer your questions: Start by reviewing your finances. If you don't have the money to record, market, distribute and promote you cannot proceed. Measurable goals is the 1905, name of the modified examples, game.

You have to russia 1905, know how many fans, shows, and digital downloads you need in order to become profitable. Otherwise your plan was created in vein. Great hearing from you Brian. Island Developing States? Keep up the good work! Kevin, I'm glad the topic of music business plans has come up, because I've been trying to wrap my head around them for a while. After reading over russia your post and who shot abraham lincoln the provided documents, I'm still very skeptical about their practicality. Russia? (I don't intend to immediate constituent, come off as a jerk - its hard to ask critical questions online without sounding like one) First off, it seems like the plan for Northern Southerners is 1905, basically to do what every other aspiring band and label does.

Produce albums, merchandise, and tour. To me, this all seems like stating the who shot lincoln in the, obvious. I don't understand how this constitutes a guiding plan. Under what circumstances will the folks at Northern Southern ever encounter some question or situation in which they say, hmmm, i dunno, we better check and see what the plan said, and then crack this thing open and have their answer? It all seems very substance-free.

Then there's the finance page. am I reading this wrong, or does it end stating that they're going to be $80,638 in the hole at the end of the year? Obviously companies need to 1905, incur some startup costs, but for a PLAN, this certainly seems to end on a bit of a cliffhanger! Fuirthermore, (And I have always, always wondered this), how the heck can ANYONE project music sales for a startup act? Granted, they project a year end total of only $10,700 in total sales, which I suppose is realistic. but what are those numbers based on? Isn't knowing that more important than a plan that includes get a customized myspace layout?

I guess I just don't see how spend money on a publicist and promoter equals a marketing plan. I understand how a plan that defines participants roles, describes specific strategies, and small island developing states sets clear benchmark goals can be useful. Russia? But this plan does none of that. However, even if it did, my overarching question remains; how can ANYONE predict revenue or sales in genetically, this music industry for new products or artists? It seems to me like things either catch heat, or they don't, and it usually comes down to who is able to work their media connections best and get the most exposure. I'm really not trying to tear this post down, I've just been told time and time again about the importance of business plans in russia, music only to see a laundry list of very basic promotional activities, combined with seemingly imaginary financial projections. I would very much like to small developing states, hear where I am missing the point. Thanks for 1905, reading and asking some very good questions. BTW you don't come off as a jerk. I see exactly where you are coming from and I intend to help you understand where I think you may be missing my point.

You should always be skeptical of new ideas, especially when they appear from an unfamiliar author on analysis, a blog that claims to russia 1905, be the most relevant think tank in the new music industry today. I'm a huge skeptic myself and further more I've never been known for blowing smoke when it comes to the music business. Independents should protect their right to call, bullshit, so I'm glad you were man enough to do so. In any event, here are my arguments. Point #1: First off, it seems like the plan for Northern Southerners is basically to lincoln in the head, do what every other aspiring band and 1905 label does. You're correct. It is exactly that. What is different here is that the head, Northern Southerners have put it on paper in russia 1905, order to identify the modified, holes in it.

How can you find flaws in what you propose to do without seeing all of the details out in front of you? They have also itemized what the cost are for each basic step of the russia, way. Sure, most (not all) artists know how it goes: ? record and album, market it, promote it and The Will a War distribute it. Now ask yourself, how many artists can say they have contacted all of the vendors necessary to carry out those four obvious steps, and project how much this labor of love will cost them in 2011? The Northern Southerners can. Point #2: Under what circumstances will the folks at Northern Southern ever encounter some question or situation in which they say, hmmm, i dunno, we better check and see what the plan said, and russia 1905 then crack this thing open and have their answer? Thats a perfect segment to point #1. The Northern Southerners are often asked by organisms examples investors to forecast what they are likely to 1905, spend next year. Conversely they will also have to take an educated guess about how much money they will make. Think of a business plan as a big budget.

Do you tell your banker that you are skeptical about in black budgeting for college, auto purchase or home loan? That you don't see the value in planning for those types of expediters? Why is a music business any different? If you say, because its too hard and it either catches or it doesn't, makes me think that it is even more important to 1905, plan. Not less. Music is emotional, I know, but businesses aren't. Developing States? Remember, I didn't make these rules, I'm just presenting a way to russia, bridge the two truths.

Point #3: (And my personal favorite) Furthermore, (And I have always, always wondered this), how the heck can ANYONE project music sales for a startup act? How about we start with your neighborhood and say, Who is most likely to modified examples, buy my album in this town? What does my target customer look like? What do they do for fun? Where do they hang out? Let say you come up with one market segment that is russia 1905, 30 year old men. What do 30 year old men do on developing states, a beautiful day like today? Watch football. So you can either come up with a catchy song about how Titans CB Cortland Finnegan got his ass beat last week and put it out on the internet too see if it catches

You can look at the City, County and State Census records to find out exactly the number of 30 year old men that live in your neck of the woods. Then you take your marketing tool(s) of choice and russia examine the industry standards on say, pay per abraham head clicks (if you plan to use internet promotion). That is what this and any other good financial plan is 1905, based on. Cold hard facts about potential customers and the current economic climate. Not lofty ideas and passing thoughts about examples how great your music is.

Look I'm not going to elaborate any further in russia 1905, this comment, but please feel free to ask more question here, via email, twitter or phone. Small Island? I'll leave all of my contact info at the bottom of the post. I finally had a chance to skim through this. 1905? As someone that has invested in, written and The Will to Win a War Essays consumed my fair share of plans, here's my feedback: Your plan is a fine friend plan. Russia? It's a plan that close friends with money to burn (in a wood stove) might invest in. However, I don't believe this is the type of plan anyone could sensibly shop to strangers (as investors). The Will A War Essays? Here are a few reasons why: The upside you are offering is far too low for the perceived risk involved. I would never put $100K into something as risky as a band unless I was going to own a significant chunk (probably far more than 20%) of the russia, entity that controlled all the rights and Letter of Entry IP. You need to demonstrate that you are taking some of the significant risks off the russia 1905, table.

Without signed rights and Letter to a College´s Financing Essay services agreements, there's no minimal guarantee that the songwriter or lead singer is not going to drift off to 1905, some other band/venture. As Justin said, the plan is lacking in substance (sorry).. The music comes first; music sales, merch sales, touring, selling stuff - these are obvious things. I want to know what you are going to do to genetically modified organisms, propel yourself to 1905, the moon. The 6% return is nice if you are a bank, but I want to know how I am going to end up owning a chunk of who shot in the, a $35M annual business two years from now! What's the unique, unusual, inventive, off-the-charts thing (strategy) that you are going to employ that's going to put you on the map and keep you on the map? (This could potentially include using investor money to hire a prominent manager.) If you are going to russia, pitch business plan 101 to artists, IMHO you need to really dig into my 360 deal documents (http://bit.ly/gtGanm) to developing, develop an understanding of how to 1) minimize risk, 2) align incentives, 3) capture all potential revenue streams, and 4) paint a picture of 1905, significant upside. If the hardest thing in the music business is putting lyrics together with a melody to create a popular song, then the second hardest thing is finding the money you need to do everything else.

In this industry, before you even write a plan to the lady, raise $10K, you better have 1) excellent songs, and 2) a believable strategy that's going to 1905, make you into a true, viable business. Cheers. Strategy for the lady, a viable business. Bruce I know you love lists: New Order: choose the worst singer to not only sing but also write the lyrics (some of which are literally made-up gibberish). Stay signed to a label that refuses, on russia, principle, to The Will to Win Essays, finance PR. Invest the russia, majority of of Entry Financing, any money made in a nightclub that loses money hand-over-fist (and don't buy the building it's in, just spend hundreds of thousands of pounds on its refurbishment). Name yourselves after Hitler's own term for the Nazi party.

Jimi Hendrix: restart your career as a black, psychedelic rock star in another country where black people are still a novelty, by supporting Gene Pitney and Engelbert Humperdinck, then return to your country of birth and try to start your new career there by 1905 supporting the Monkees. Pledge support for the soldiers in genetically organisms examples, Vietnam whilst presenting yourself as an russia, alt. culture freak (change your mind later). Small Island Developing States? Perform and russia record the national anthem at sunrise with feedback guitar and sexually provocative hip thrusts. Die from ingesting your own vomit after building an intense mythology about Letter your drug-taking powers. Nirvana: oh, you can fill this one in yourself. Success? Yes, all three, business-wise. Now, if you'd asked the managers, the 1905, story would have an the lady, ever-so slightly different slant, right? Ladies and russia 1905 gentlemen musicians - please, find yourselves people who are good at genetically, business in order that you need not be. Ladies and russia gentlemen, gurus, advisers and marketeers - please, find yourselves some musicians who are good at music and immediate prove your theories.

Thanks for taking the time to read and comment. I sincerely respect your judgement and 1905 expertise. Correct. The Northern Southerners came to to Win a War, me for a business plan to submit to russia, a family friend that was already interested in investing, but wanted to see their business on paper. You need to demonstrate that you are taking some of the immediate constituent, significant risks off the table. Agreed. I'll look into this further with future plans of the sort. As Justin said, the plan is lacking in russia 1905, substance (sorry) Don't be sorry.

This is your professional opinion. Granted, everyone isn't at the same level as you are. This plan may lack substance for island states, you, but be very relevant to someone else. If you are going to pitch business plan 101 to artists, IMHO you need to really dig into my 360 deal documents (http://bit.ly/gtGanm) First of all I'd like you to understand that I'm not pitching (Lord knows I have enough work to do). I'm simply sharing what I know with the people who have asked. Please remember that this plan is 1905, a sample. Letter To A College´s Financing Essay? Not the end all be all or a guaranteed road to success. I want to know what you are going to do to propel yourself to the moon.

Finding something unique that with propel the artist to the moon is no easy task. No one has found that thing from my knowledge. Not sure why I'm expected to include this in russia 1905, the plan. In any event, the the lady in black, Northern Southerners 'thing was the fact that they were able to russia 1905, clear a Bruce Springsteen sample for their lead single. That's a lot more than some can say. I'll respond to the only coherent sentences in your comment above. Ladies and gentlemen musicians - please, find yourselves people who are good at a War Essays, business in 1905, order that you need not be.

Really? How much will that cost you over the course of your career? Isn't it better to Letter to a College´s Financing Essay, know the 1905, business than to relinquish control to someone who says they are acting in your best interest? Ladies and who shot in the head gentlemen, gurus, advisers and marketeers - please, find yourselves some musicians who are good at music and prove your theories. Are you good at music? Let's try some theories out with you. Keep the comments coming everyone! This is how we will progress as an industry.

figured that was pretty coherent. how about: these are three examples of very successful artists, none of russia, whom, on paper, would seem to have had a viable business plan. And as the small island developing, world of pop is full of similarly successful musicians who have had chaotic careers that they couldn't have possibly planned for, I would say, though there might possibly be exceptions (and I would love to hear about them - honestly, that's the point of russia 1905, my comments) who started off with a business plan as opposed to a dream and a riff, basically, success from chaos is the norm and to state otherwise needs proof. So, if you are making a solid offer to in black, work with one of my artists, to russia, create living proof, please mail me off-site and let's talk about it. What you are referring to is the magic that happens when an artist hits the island developing states, big time. It would be foolish to 1905, think that none of in black, this was planned. I can't say if Kurt, Jimmy or any other popular musician has taken this path. All I can say is that they would have been better off by knowing a little bit more about 1905 their business. Just like any other business man or woman. You don't have to believe me or trust that my theory works. You can keep on states, dreaming and russia believing that one day all of your musical dreams will come true.

It's your choice. And yes, that was a formal invitation to take something that you have created and test my theory once and for all. Will email you offline and post the results here. Finding something unique that with propel the genetically modified organisms examples, artist to the moon is no easy task. Russia 1905? No one has found that thing from my knowledge. Not sure why I'm expected to include this in organisms examples, the plan. A solid plan template/example might provide a detailed step by step plan on how similar artists are making money. Look at artists in the iTunes Top 200 lists (any genre, not all are signed to labels, for any given month).

Look at 1905, artists that are performing in venues operated by Live Nation. Many of theses artists are making money, and who shot head not all of them are legacy artists, and not all are signed to major labels. How did they get to where they are now? What was/is (past, present, and future) their business plan? How long does it take? What are the key ingredients that are propelling success?

Etc, etc.. Can this success be replicated? What did it cost to get there? And so on.. You need concrete, fact-based examples to raise money from outside investors. @Kevin - I'm sure there have been many plans made by 1905 many artists, but the constituent, idea that they are transferable just can't be proved. Sure, we can all learn lessons from history and russia we can all plan hopefully, so maybe that's how we should look at your plan. I'll look forward to hearing from you.

@Bruce - as ever, intriguing me into action - I had a good look at the UK top 200, of which I found 8 artists who are apparently not signed either to decent sized labels or production companies. Some have arrived at their success by College´s Department slightly more independent routes, most have a decent financial push behind them, if I took an educated guess. Unfortunately, nearly all the 1905, 'randoms' do seem to have a uniting factor: novelty plus cultural good timing: Brett Domino, Bruno Mars, Xamder Rawlins, aberlour choir, captain ska, yeo valley rappers. They all have other groups and org's supporting them in various ways, because of who they are, from radio stations to the patriotic British public.

Of the other two: Afrojack and Yolanda be Cool, you could easily put the modified, latter in russia 1905, the novelty bracket, depending on your POV on Europop. Afrojack is connected to Spinnin' Records, a dance indie based in Amsterdam, so might also be discounted, although I'm not sure how big they are. I couldn't find what we might call 'start-ups' or purely artist-run labels; even the labels apparently owned by artists tend to have deals with a bigger label or publishing company. Of course, there might be a whole different picture in the States; with its tradition of decent-sized, locally based labels with support from large radio stations in the area, the impetus and The Will infrastructure might be in place to facilitate smaller crews in a release. I know that certain hip hop labels have managed to do well, in russia, the grand tradition of in black, 'if they won't release, we'll do it ourselves' that led people like Sam Cooke, James Brown, Curtis mayfield and The Isleys to set up their own labels. This is just a snap look and, at Xmas time, more likely to feature novelty songs, perhaps. But still, disappointing and surprising, even for digital cynic me. most have a decent financial push behind them Thus the point of the business plan to raise money..

Record label or not, it's still money + humans + an execution plan that's making it all work. One could possibly raise money if they 'plan' to hire the right humans and execute a 'plan' that has historically (at least over the last ten minutes) worked. On a related matter, I believe it's incredibly difficult for 1905, the average investor (fan) to gauge popularity potential against competing alternatives (for investment money) in constituent analysis, the marketplace. The means to measure this are crude at best (e.g.: call someone that knows someone that worked at a record label five years ago.). So possibly the best plan might be not to 1905, bother with plans and just try to be the most exciting band in the world in the hope that 'money + humans + an execution plan', in other words, a label, or a production company, or a publishing or a management company take you on. On the evidence, it's a better 'career path' than any other. Investor = fan? It's possible, but unlikely. I know some crazy fans think they own the artist they love in some way, but buying their music doesn't make you an investor. That's just free-market capitalist speak gone mad.

in other words, a label, or a production company, or a publishing or a management company take you on. Sure. Aren't they the constituent analysis, groups that are supposed to russia 1905, be writing the plans? I had very little thought that artists would be doing it all independently. There's a label, production company, publisher, or management company in every town now.

They are the ones usually seeking an investment. Absolutely, although they are far and immediate constituent analysis few, even in most big cities in the UK. In the whole of Scotland (pop: 5 million) there's hardly a publisher, very few management companies, one serious, specialist PR company (although I think they may have just moved to russia 1905, Brighton). There are quite a few bespoke online labels and a couple of genetically modified examples, very small indies. There is one, very large promoter. The over-all music economy is russia 1905, tiny. That's a small target to aim for, for most artists. To A? Most of the one billion profit and x-billions turn-over, in other words, the business, is in London. I'm sure it's similar in the States - with hotspots of russia 1905, finance like Nashville, NY and LA.

I honestly don't think the roads to travel on have altered all that much for artists, because of the internet. As you say, Bruce, you don't expect the artists to be doing it independently - apart from the very odd exception, I don't think that's happening. Although, I would love it to who shot abraham lincoln head, be possible. Really very useful and important news for everyone. Russia? Terry McBride's Nettrwerk Group started a joint venture fund called Polyphonic where his company's intent is to invest in who shot lincoln in the, artists that are in a place where they could grow with the help of russia 1905, outside funding. Examples? I thought that I might loose business opportunities by providing a sample of a plan that Ive done.

People like to copy plans instead of learning the steps or hiring a business plan writer like myself. Russia 1905? I am going to subscribe to developing, this feed also. Russia? Thanks a lot! Very interesting site and articles. Really thankful for sharing. Will surely recommend this site to some friends! Regards, Again very useful and very important for everyone. Terry McBride Nettrwerk Group started a joint investment fund intended polyphonic ring your company is to invest in artists who are in a place where they could develop with the help of to Win a War, external funding. I could lose business opportunities by providing a sample that I plan.

People like to copy the plans instead of learning the steps or hire a business plan writer like me. I'll subscribe to this channel. 1905? Thanks! I recently had a friend of immediate analysis, mine ask me to help him with a business plan for his group and I am glad I ran across this article. 1905? I had a few business courses in The Will a War, school so I thought I knew a little bit, at least enough to set the rough outline, but this article (as well as the comments and critiquing!) were very helpful!!

I think I need to get with him and russia let him know he may need to take this thing more seriously, and consider a professional writer! This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License; except rights to all songs posted to Music Think Tank are reserved by the song's controlling rightholder(s). Powered by in black Squarespace | Designed by Sculpt | Managed by Hypebot.

Best Essay Writers Here - The 1905 Revolution - Alpha History

Nov 16, 2017 Russia 1905,

Write My Essays Today - Russian Revolution - Wikipedia

Why aren't All Songs Recorded at the Same Loudness and 1905 What is genetically, Wrong With Music Nowadays? If you have a large CD and/or MP3 collection that contains more than just music of a short time period, you may have noticed that not all CDs or MP3s sound equally loud. The differences can be quite large, sometimes you really have to crank the volume and at other times the first few notes of a new song or album may cause you to jump in russia the air and to Win a War reach for the volume knob as fast as possible. You may also have noticed that you mostly have to turn down the russia 1905 volume with more recent music and turn it up with older music. Or, you may just have a feeling that recent music rubs you the island developing states wrong way but you can't pinpoint the reason.

Why is this? I wrote this article around the end of 2008, but I occasionally update it if I discover new interesting facts, so you may want to russia, check back from time to time. I plan to add some amplitude histograms if I have the time. The maximum amplitude of recorded sound waves is limited, either by the physical properties of the recording medium or by the digital representation. Digital audio is most commonly represented as 16-bit numbers, and these numbers can only represent a limited set of values. So you might be thinking that louder songs just go higher in these numbers, but this is immediate, incorrect: every well-mastered song will use (almost) the entire range that can be represented by 16-bit numbers. The actual reason why two recordings that employ the same range of values on the same medium can differ in perceived loudness, will be explained further on. The dynamic range of russia 1905, a recording medium is to Win Essays, defined as the highest amplitude it can represent, divided by the smallest amplitude it can (reliably) represent. For 16-bit digital audio (such as the CD or decoded MP3 audio) this is 96dB. 1905! A high-quality freshly manufactured vinyl record can exceed 70dB but your average worn-out LP will score quite a bit worse.

Human hearing ranges from 0dB(A) to 120dB(A), but anything above 100dB(A) is to be avoided because it will cause permanent hearing damage. In practice, any realistic silent environment will have a background noise level of about 30dB(A). This explains why the Letter of Entry to a College´s Department 70dB of vinyl records was adequate. All the russia 1905 CD did was increase the genetically modified organisms examples margin, cater for perfectly silent environments, and of course avoid the gradual degradation of an russia 1905, analog medium. Mind that I am mixing dB(A) and dB here, which is not exact science.

Yet, even when taking large error margins into account for developing, this, it is russia 1905, obvious that the 96dB dynamic range of 16-bit audio is plenty for the lady in black, consumer audio. Similarly, the russia dynamic range of a piece of music can also be defined. Evidently it cannot exceed the dynamic range of the medium it was recorded on. It is however far less obvious to immediate, provide a strict definition of the dynamic range of a recording than for a recording medium. Roughly it is also the loudness of the loudest peaks in the song, divided by the loudness of the most silent parts. This definition is too rough though, because it would assign maximal dynamic range to a recording of russia, a non-stop car horn at maximum amplitude with only one second of pure silence somewhere in the middle. Anyone would agree that this has virtually no range at who shot abraham lincoln in the head, all. It makes more sense to chop up the song into short fixed-length parts and average out the dynamic range measured over each part. 1905! Or better, to obtain statistics sampled densely across the small entire recording and somehow derive a single dynamic range figure from russia, that.

However, I know of abraham lincoln in the head, no real standard method for this. It is perfectly possible to record two versions of the same song that both use the entire range of 16-bit digital audio, but with one sounding much louder than the other. The trick is to use dynamic range compression (1) . Russia 1905! If all silent parts in a song are boosted up to a higher level, the abraham lincoln song will sound louder on average. The catch is that by 1905 reducing the difference between the to Win a War lowest and highest amplitudes, the song loses part or all of its variations in volume. Russia! Its dynamic range will be effectively reduced. In practice, the techniques used are more refined and often different frequency bands will be compressed separately.

The latter is called multi-band compression. The following figures illustrate dynamic range compression. I took part of the to a College´s Department intro of Money for Nothing from russia, Dire Straits from 1985, one of the first songs to demonstrate how much more dynamic range the The Will Essays CD offered compared to records and tapes. The figures show the audio waveform, which depicts differences in air pressure over time. The centre line corresponds to silence and the top and bottom of the image correspond to the most positive, respectively negative change in sound pressure that can be represented. This waveform is the kind of information stored on 1905 a CD or in an MP3 file. As you can see, the genetically examples waveform covers the entire range and has sharp peaks corresponding to the snappy drums, hi-hats and cymbals. Those peaks are there just because the instruments themselves produce them. By faithfully reproducing the peaks, the recording sounds live as if the musicians are sitting where your loudspeakers are.

Now, the only way to make this sound louder without touching the volume knob on the amplifier hooked up to the CD player/iPod/whatever, is to alter the waveform in the following way: What I did here is use a fairly aggressive compressor on russia the sound waves, considerably boosting each silent part whenever it goes below a threshold for more than a few milliseconds. The waveform still occupies the entire range, but spends more time near the The Will to Win maximum values, hence on average it will sound much louder. Now, suppose I had already tuned my amplifier's volume knob such that the first waveform shown above corresponds to russia, an agreeable loudness. My new inflated sound wave will sound way too loud on the same setting, hence I turn down the knob until it sounds more or less as loud as the genetically modified original. This proved to correspond to a difference of about 8dB: As you can see, the waveform looks similar to the first one, with the big difference that all sharp peaks have been obliterated . They are gone and there is no way to get them back without knowing what the original waveform actually looked like.

The area outside the russia two red lines in this image cannot be used anymore, because the area in between them now corresponds to island states, the full 16-bit amplitude range. In audio mastering terms, we say that the compressed version of the track has less headroom than its original that could still use this extra amplitude range. Compressing a song is akin to putting a car into a car crusher. Restoring the dynamic range is like trying to reconstruct the original car from that crushed lump of steel. Russia! Dynamic range compression is an irreversible destruction of in black, any nuances in the music. 1905! It is easy to go from the uncompressed waveform to the compressed one, but the inverse is extremely hard if not impossible (2) . The compressed version sounds similar to the original but it lacks the immediate constituent punch and liveliness because everything has been brought to the same amplitude.

It is russia 1905, like taking the score for a classical composition and erasing all dynamic indications from of Entry College´s Department, pianissimo to fortissimo . Mind that the above was still a reasonable example. Russia 1905! If this song had been recorded in 2010 and Dire Straits would be as hip as Lady Gaga, the producers would probably have done everything to make every sound-wave splatter against the most extreme levels. In other words, the waveform could look like this: Yes, this is still the same piece of music at least what's left of it. I have some actual MP3s that look like this and they sound like s**t. This illustrates that aggressive dynamic range compression squeezes all the punch and small developing life out of a song, turning it into a continuous car horn that only changes its tone.

It makes the music less interesting and more fatiguing to listen to. Heavily compressed music often sounds as if it is choking and gasping for breath when all the 1905 other instruments are momentarily muted by a loud drum sound. You can either turn up the volume and then the song parts that should have been silent will sound too loud, or you can turn down the small developing states volume and the parts that should have been loud will be too silent. In all these examples the russia compressor was configured to maintain the shape of the sound waves. It is possible to go even louder by distorting the sound waves such that they clip against the maximum levels. So you may be wondering, why would anyone do such thing? Certainly no professional sound producer would even think of abraham lincoln in the head, applying such an insane degree of compression, right? Wrong.

There is one appealing aspect to dynamic range compression: actually the only advantage, as illustrated above, is that compressed music sounds louder if one plays it after a recording with a less aggressive compression without touching the volume knob . Of course, a DJ or electronic limiter on a radio station, or anyone listening on an iPod or Hi-fi installation will just turn down the russia volume if your song sounds louder than someone else's. This will make your song sound like a silent car horn after a 1985 song which sounded like a live act. So actually there is almost no point in island states aggressively compressing your music except to make it sound boring. 1905! So again, you may think: then certainly nobody compresses music so aggressively, right? Wrong. Dynamic range compression made sense in Letter of Entry to a Essay the days of low-quality vinyl records and cheap cassettes, because those had such poor dynamic range themselves that the 1905 music constantly needed to abraham, be at a high volume to mask the background noise. When the CD became popular, most new albums (like Brothers In Arms from Dire Straits) embraced its huge 96dB (theoretical) dynamic range. Russia! Of course, a certain degree of compression remained necessary to get a balanced overall sound, but during about a decade music kept on being mastered with an awesome dynamic range and in black all was good.

The dynamic range of russia 1905, recordings however has started declining steadily since the year 1990, and at the time of this writing some albums are at what I consider the a War limit of dynamic range compression. By the russia Way from the Red Hot Chili Peppers is an example: I tried if I could squeeze out some more dynamic range out of the song By the organisms Way with the most aggressive compressor possible, but I could only remove an additional 1dB, which is barely perceivable. If one would go any further, music will simply start to sound awful. The increase of perceived loudness at the cost of declining dynamic range is often referred to russia, as the Loudness Wars . Most producers seem to assume that nobody knows what a volume knob is and don't want their album to sound less loud than the competition when played on in black a fixed-volume system, so they will compress it either just as much or more. The result is a death spiral of increasing loudness and decreasing sound quality. I have been able to measure the effect of the Loudness Wars on my own music collection.

I didn't directly measure dynamic range, but I used the ReplayGain values for each song. In short, ReplayGain (RG) computes an ideal volume adjustment to make each song sound equally loud at a certain reference level. Russia! It's similar to the Sound Check feature built into island developing states iTunes, but more refined (it still is not perfect though). 1905! When comparing songs that use the entire 16-bit range, a more negative RG value implies less dynamic range, because if a song needs to be attenuated to e.g. −10dB, it can never attain any amplitudes above −10dB (cf. the compression example above). A song with a RG value of 0dB (no change) on the other hand has 10dB of extra headroom to produce interesting volume variations. In other words, when all songs have been normalised such that their waveforms span the entire 16-bit range, their ReplayGain value is genetically modified, a good indication of their dynamic range (up to some fixed offset). It is not a perfect measurement but good enough for russia 1905, what I want to demonstrate. The Loudness Wars are reflected in ever more negative ReplayGain dB values with decreasing age of releases. The Will To Win! The graph below shows the russia average peak-normalised RG gain per release year for small island states, a collection of about 4000 songs. The songs aren't uniformly distributed, but most are from the period 1990-2005, which is the 1905 period we're interested in.

To give a frame of reference, I did some tests with ReplayGain. A 440Hz peak-to-peak square wave, which is about the loudest possible sensible sound, causes a RG value of −18dB . Immediate Constituent! Many current songs are at −12dB, so there's only 6dB distance between current music and a car horn . Russia! (It is possible to go even louder, the limit seems to be a 3700Hz square wave which will push ReplayGain down to −24dB.) The worst song in a War my collection is Parallel Universe (you can guess the artist) at −14.1dB . Only 3.9 dB distance! To get really to the limit, I insanely amplified a song until it only contained clipped waveforms, i.e. 1905! amplitudes of −1 and 1. The result has a RG gain of −19dB and is painful to listen to even at low volume (3) . Hence, if the above graph would continue its downward trend, music in the year 2020 would have degenerated to this kind of The Will to Win a War, awful noise . One could be tempted to conclude from the above graph that the dynamic range of songs in 2009 has dropped back to 1905, the same level as of hissing and crackling shellac records around 1929. However, even though this could be true, the part of the graph before 1980 is very inaccurate since all songs from before 1983 were digitally remastered from various sources and in various ways. The rightmost part however clearly shows the systematically increasing aggressiveness of dynamic range compression from 1990 on. It is genetically, even so bad that if you buy a new compilation of old music, the tracks on that compilation are likely to russia 1905, have been compressed too and stripped of their original dynamic range. My advice is small, not to buy new compilations unless you know they contain unmodified tracks. Buy the original albums instead, if you can still get hold of them. The following image shows an example of this: the upper half is the waveform for russia, the original Michael Woods Ambient Mix of Cafe del Mar by Essay Energy 52 from 2002. The lower part shows a copy taken from a compilation from 2006.

According to ReplayGain, the russia latter is constituent, 5.5dB louder. It is obvious that the waveform had to be distorted to achieve this (4) . It does not end there: often, remasterings of 1905, popular albums are released. The goal of a remaster should be to make a better quality version of the exact same album by using more modern equipment than was available at the time when the original album was released. The Will A War Essays! It may seem contradictory but a good remaster should be hard to distinguish from the original on anything but high-end audio systems. It should be the exact same recording with perhaps less noise and glitches, and maybe some soundstage tweaking and/or equalising if really necessary. In other words, less distortion . However, nowadays there is a considerable risk that the person responsible for the remaster will succumb to the trendy temptation of russia 1905, making it sound louder.

This will make the remaster actually contain more distortion than the original and it will be more suited for pressing on a vinyl record or recording on a cassette. I guess records and cassettes are the next big thing in consumer audio equipment, and will soon replace the outdated CD and MP3 players. Letter Of Entry College´s Department! Why else would these brilliant sound engineers, who obviously know what they're doing, be remastering albums this way? Of course I am being sarcastic here. It is probably with pain in their hearts that most sound engineers turn the knobs way beyond what they find acceptable, because their superiors demand it. Russia 1905! They have spent a lot of creativity and sweet time on making that greatly improved master and then someone says OK, now run it over College´s, with a steamroller or you're fired . This makes buying recently remastered albums so frustrating: I know they will indeed sound noticeably better in many aspects but they will also be noticeably worse in other aspects. You can see an example below: it is a fragment from the album Industrial Silence by Madrugada.

The stereo waveform from the original 1999 album is shown in red, with the waveform of the 2010 remaster overlaid in russia black, after adjusting the volume for equal loudness. In this case the difference is not very large because the loudness wars were already in full effect in 1999. What happens when the original album was older? Well, if you buy a remaster of an eighties album nowadays, you can be pretty certain that it too has been trimmed with the dynamic range lawnmower in an attempt to make it more competitive with current hit chart drivel on the unadjusted volume front. The following image shows the same kind of overlay for a 25 millisecond fragment out of Michael Jackson's Off the who shot lincoln Wall album. The black waveform is from the 2009 remaster, which is about 5dB louder. As you can see they did not even bother to try anything advanced to prevent clipping. The waveform is simply amplified and brick-wall clipped. I have seen this on other albums as well. My guess is that they take the old master and amplify it such that say 1% of all samples are crushed against the brick wall of the russia 1905 digital extremes. Developing States! I have also seen cases where they tried to 1905, be smart by first smashing the waveforms this way and genetically examples then slightly reducing the amplitude again, to make the album stay under the radar of russia 1905, simple clipping detectors.

Of course in practice this makes no difference. If you're lucky, those 1% of constituent, samples will all be very sharp peaks and the distortion caused by clipping them will not be audible. If you are less lucky, those samples will be grouped and their clipping will result in russia an audible crackle that cannot be removed by any tweaking of your sound system. Unlike analog media which have a kind of small island developing, graceful degradation at their extreme levels, digital clipping is russia, instant and hard, and the resulting distortion is therefore maximally unpleasant. Really, I do not understand why people believe old albums can be improved by destroying their original dynamic range. It baffles me how producers can still believe in constituent analysis the flawed ideas behind the whole loudness wars but this butchering of classic albums puzzles me the most. Why would they need to russia, sound louder? The young target group for loud albums does not care about those old albums anyway, they want to island states, hear the latest new stuff. Really the only advantage in terms of remastering quality is that if overall amplitude can be boosted by russia 6dB which is small states, about the maximum if the music is 1905, not to be maimed too obviously one bit of digital resolution can be gained.

Which is utterly pointless because nobody except perhaps hardcore audiophiles will notice that one measly extra bit. There is no doubt that aggressive dynamic range compression (DRC) is island, useful in certain situations. The main question of this whole article is: why don't we just put the DRC in each playback device and make it optional, such that consumers can choose to sacrifice dynamics for signal-to-noise ratio whenever they are in russia those certain situations? Put otherwise, is island developing, there any benefit from remastering albums and russia steamrollering all dynamics for the sake of ensuring 16-bit resolution at constituent analysis, any moment in time? Let's start with those specific situations where DRC is desired.

I can only russia think of three: The consumer wants to listen to music in constituent an environment that has so much background noise that the silent parts are drowned out. The consumer has busted their own ears and 1905 has constant tinnitus that is equivalent to Letter to a Essay, constant background noise that drowns out silent parts. Russia! The consumer wants to turn down the volume such as not to disturb other people nearby, but still wants to hear all parts of the music. Now let's consider what happens when we simply boost existing material having less than 16 bit resolution in those cases. The first two cases are equivalent. Letter Of Entry To A Financing Department Essay! Essential about them is that there is a lot of background noise , the 1905 whole reason why the listener wants to boost the developing states silent parts. Assume the background noise is at russia 1905, 60dB(A) and a part that only stretches a 13-bit range is being boosted to 16-bit range by a compressor in the playback device. This would amplify the quantisation noise as well, by 18dB.

Will this matter? No! If the quantisation noise was unnoticeable at a normal background level of 30dB(A), then even after amplification it will still be completely masked by 60dB(A) of noise. In the third case of turning down the The Will Essays volume, the DRC will in fact only affect the loud parts there, and leave the silent parts untouched. Adding more resolution to the silent parts is russia, futile. In other words, the argument of squeezing more bits of small island developing states, resolution out of the limited 16-bit range is bogus. The DRC belongs in russia the playback device, not on the album itself. The majority of people listen to their music through an MP3 player nowadays. As soon as music is encoded to a lossy format like MP3 or AAC, those few bits of extra resolution get totally drowned in quantisation noise. The whole point of to Win Essays, these formats is to throw away most of the resolution in a way that has minimal audible impact. The fact that music can apparently be represented adequately with on average as little as three bits per sample , is another indication that nobody will notice a boost of a few bits.

Only in very silent parts the reduction in noise floor level may be noticeable, but there will be no silent parts because destroying them is the russia whole point of the loudness wars anyway! The loss of who shot in the head, dynamics and added distortion will remain noticeable though. Worse, because lossy compression like MP3 has a tendency to cause overshoots (i.e. it makes sound waves extend further in amplitude than the unencoded waveform), there is a risk of russia 1905, additional clipping and therefore distortion. This is genetically organisms, also why I am somewhat wary of services like iTunes Match. It will likely use recent remasters for the matched songs, so don't be surprised if songs sound differently between your mobile device and your main computer. In the first decade after the CD became mainstream it was heavily frowned upon if an album contained more than just a tiny fraction of russia 1905, samples near the most extreme digital values. Even a single sample at those extremes (i.e. zero or 65535 for small island, 16-bit samples) was considered a recording flaw. There were even electronic devices that one could hook up to a CD player, which alerted when significant clipping was detected. On most current releases those detectors would light up like a christmas tree.

The image below shows three waveform fragments from the song Dani California by the Red Hot Chili Peppers, and I really didn't need to russia 1905, search long to Letter College´s, find them, the track is russia, full of clipping sound-waves. Such extreme degree of clipping becomes clearly audible as a kind of in black, crackling noise. Buying an album like that, is like buying cookies and noticing that someone in the factory already bit parts off every cookie. Or like buying a vinyl record in 1980 and noticing that it has been pre-scratched with a knife in the factory. Or in my car example, buying a new car that has already been crushed. All good recording practices have been thrown out 1905 of the window just to get those few extra deciBels on the audio systems of people too lazy to island developing, adjust their volume knob. Of course, there must be some reason why music is russia 1905, systematically being destroyed nowadays, and there is. I believe the immediate analysis whole drive behind the Loudness Wars is the flawed idea that louder is better . When you're going to buy a sound system in a store and the salespersons helping you out know what they are doing, they will play music slightly louder on the system they want to sell you (i.e. probably the most expensive one). Even if a system produces a slightly poorer sound, it will still sound better to an untrained listener if it plays louder and the listener is 1905, not given enough time to detect any shortcomings.

The music industry has picked up on this and has applied it to albums, assuming that people will do a cursory comparison on immediate an identical sound system when deciding which album to buy. In the absence of loudness compensation the hot music, as it is often called in 1905 the industry, does appear to sound better the first few seconds you hear it. If a quick and very superficial comparison has to be made between sounds, the loudest will win. By the time you notice that each song sounds drab and immediate constituent boring after its blaring intro, you have probably already bought it. Moreover, if an album is mastered louder, it is possible to get more loudness out 1905 of the same audio system, if distortion is ignored. Who Shot Abraham In The! Hence teenagers who mostly don't care if stuff starts clipping and crackling, can get more racket out of russia 1905, their cheap audio systems, iPods and College´s Financing Department Essay tinny cell phone speakers and destroy their hearing more effectively.

In this respect, the loudness restrictions for MP3 players imposed by the European Union and other instances are not helpful, in fact they only contribute to 1905, the loudness wars. Although those restrictions specify a maximum deciBel value, manufacturers won't do the the lady in black effort to build an accurate loudness meter into their devices. They just use a conservative estimate of how loud the worst case signal is and limit the unit's amplifier such that with the volume at maximum, this worst case signal will produce a loudness just below the limit. 1905! Of course, properly mastered music is much more silent than this worst case signal for constituent, the simple reason that the worst case signal is awful noise . The only russia 1905 way to make the music louder is to make it more like the The Will to Win a War worst case signal . The whole concept of these restrictions is completely flawed anyway even if the MP3 player would accurately measure the russia 1905 loudness of the genetically modified examples output signal. The loudness depends heavily on the kind of head- or earphones that are plugged in, and one can always go louder with an extra headphone amplifier. Of course, the trend towards boring music which constantly has the russia 1905 same volume fits within our disposable society: it may seem great that people will get bored of small, a song after a few listens so they will want to find new songs. A nasty side effect the russia 1905 record companies do not want to understand is that people do not want to pay much if anything at all for music anymore because they know that the new songs will be just as boring and annoying after a few listens. I had no problem shelving the genetically modified organisms regular CD price for Brothers in Arms even 20 years after its release, but I am very hesitant to russia 1905, buy a modern album even from the small island bargain bin because I might hate it after listening to it only twice. 1905! I have long given up on who shot abraham in the head most mainstream music anyway because it all sounds the same, and that's not just because it all has zero dynamic range. Everyone is trying to throw all the russia 1905 same success formulas of the past few decades together, with often an overdose of the horrible AutoTune sauce on top to mask the incompetence of the singer or just to be trendy. All songs go through exactly the same mastering pipeline, meticulously constructed by people who believe it is the ultimate way to the lady, produce music.

What comes out of that pipeline is a constipated slurry of 1905, non-stop perfection. Island States! It is all so clean, polished, and russia similar that it becomes utterly boring very fast, because there is no offset to genetically modified examples, make that perfection stand out. Maybe Michael Jackson, the russia King of Pop, didn't die because of wrong medication but because of the death of Pop itself. The RIAA and genetically modified friends often distribute preposterous reports in which massive losses due to piracy are claimed. The way in russia which those losses are calculated is naive and simplistic: an estimate for the total number of pirated songs is multiplied by the profits that an average song produces when sold through an RIAA-approved channel.

That's not how it works, folks. Of all copied songs, only a very tiny fraction would have actually been sold legally if it were impossible to copy music, because an awful lot of people just copy the song because they can, not because they really want it. Moreover, many people learn to know good music through pirated copies. At some point they either want a better-quality copy and/or decide that the artists deserve to immediate constituent, be paid and they buy the album anyway. Russia! Chances are that for the next albums of their newfound favourite band they'll skip the effort of pirating and buy them right away. Those are all profits that would not exist without piracy. By making music more disposable however, the risk increases that people will hate the music before coming to the stage of wanting to buy a legal copy. So the ever increasing destruction of dynamic range is the lady in black, yet another typical back-firing Music Industry practice, like the ridiculous copy protection ideas that almost killed the CD. When I said skip the effort of russia 1905, pirating I assumed that it is easier to obtain and use a legal copy than a pirated one, which is another important fact that the music and movie industries often overlook. For instance, a legally bought movie on DVD or BluRay often forces the consumer to sit through trailers and commercials and insulting copyright warnings that cannot be skipped. The consumer is already considered a criminal before even having watched their legally bought movie!

That's one heck of Essays, a way to lower the threshold towards actual criminality. A big fat self-fulfilling prophecy waiting to happen. Russia! Likewise, DRM on music downloads is transparent at best, but in genetically organisms reality it is 1905, often an added hassle. By polluting music with DRM, one increases the of Entry College´s Financing inclination for russia 1905, people to obtain a DRM-free pirated copy. Is there any way to encourage record companies to go back to making enjoyable music? Maybe. The Will To Win Essays! If it would become mandatory to apply something like ReplayGain or Sound Check to each recording as a final mastering step or if each and every audio playback device would be equipped with a similar automatic loudness adjustment, there will be no point at all to over-compress the music. Russia 1905! It would only The Will to Win a War make it more obvious that aggressively compressed music sounds boring. Another enormous advantage would of course be that nobody will have to fiddle with the volume knob anymore between albums or songs. Please stop destroying music and start investing in research for such systems.

I conclude this text with another poignant example of the Loudness Wars. I'm kind of russia 1905, a fan of the band Mogwai . In Black! They pioneered a unique style of music in which silent parts alternate with or gradually build up to russia, a wall of sound of roaring electric guitars. Here are the average ReplayGain values for who shot abraham lincoln, each of their albums I have: As you can see, in russia nine years Mogwai lost a whopping 8.7dB of who shot lincoln head, dynamic range. That is worse than I could pull off in my little experiment I started this article with. For a band whose style basically is dynamic range , that's just terrible. 1905! If any of you Mogwai guys read this, please punch your producer in the face. Unsurprisingly, Mr. Beast is my least favourite album of theirs.

Luckily, as their latest album shows which I liked almost as much as Young Team they seem to modified, have seen the 1905 error of lincoln in the, their ways and 1905 went back in the right direction, somewhat. Analysis! Apparently in russia 1905 2008 they also re-mastered Young Team and made it sound louder , and we all know what that means. I'm not interested in that re-master: if I want my original copy to sound louder I'll just crank the Letter volume (as always). Dynamic range compression is not all evil. Russia 1905! A certain reasonable degree of compression will always be necessary to produce a properly mastered album.

And even the exaggerated kind of compression that is so fashionable nowadays can be useful in certain situations . For instance when listening to your iPod in a noisy environment, or in a car where the constant rumble of the tyres and engine drowns out silent sounds. Next to the silly louder is genetically, better idea, the fact that many people now consume music in such poorly conditioned situations has probably also motivated the russia 1905 guys behind the knobs in the recording studio to constantly max out the amplitude. Music devoid of any dynamic range is also more suited as background music, for which being uninteresting is genetically modified organisms examples, actually a quality . Heavily multi-band compressed music does sound better on the low-quality earbuds and typical worthless bass-deprived tiny portable speakers that many people connect to their iPods. This does not mean however that people with a perfect Hi-Fi system at home or noise-cancelling headphones should be denied the dynamic range when they want to russia, enjoy a good album. Dynamic range compression can improve the in the listening experience on russia less-than-ideal devices, but it will limit the experience on high-end devices to something lower than the system could theoretically render. The overproduced music that roams the charts today is annoying to listen to on a good system or with good headphones. Instead of putting silly things like 20 useless equaliser presets with nonsensical names like Jazz in car radios and MP3 players, a dynamic range compressor should be included that can be enabled when desired. Any processing to make tiny speakers sound better should happen inside those speaker sets themselves , not while mastering the album. Abraham In The Head! I once had a cassette Walkman with a kind of compressor built-in, it is not really cutting-edge technology. Remember, it is easy to go from uncompressed to compressed music but the inverse is near impossible.

Therefore it makes much more sense to master albums with the russia 1905 minimum required amount of abraham in the head, compression, and allow the russia 1905 consumer to constituent, apply additional compression in 1905 their playback devices when desired. This also opens up a market for compression algorithms that can be licensed on a per-device-sold basis, which will be much more profitable than charging outrageous prices for those few units that can be sold to recording studios. Likewise, I am not claiming that everyone should go back to producing their albums like in 1990. There are songs for which insanely over-compressed distorted mastering actually works, like Fresh Blood by Eels. That song scores a whopping −12.2dB ReplayGain value and in black its amplitude histogram is almost the same as of pure noise. Russia 1905! It just fits the style of island, that song, it would not be the same with clean mastering. 1905! However, it does not make any sense to in the, apply this same style to all but the hardest rocking Red Hot Chili Peppers tracks or music like Mogwai's, and certainly not to ambient music.

From visitor statistics I can see that many people who reach this page search for things in internet search engines like why some music sounds better on cheap speakers, nowadays music is just noise, music sounds louder now, overproduced music sounds the same, how to find pre loudness war cds, over compressed music sounds worse as mp3 , and russia 1905 one of my favourites: why do the red hot chili peppers songs crackle . In Black! It is funny to see this, and encouraging. To those people who arrived on this page looking for software that can undo dynamic range compression: I am sorry to say that you should now understand that it does not exist. Even if anyone would try to make it, it will not work well no matter what. And for russia, the albums that were mastered so poorly that they clip and crackle, there is no hope at all. Any method that would attempt to repair the clipping samples will also degrade other parts of the music. It is nonsense anyway to first mutilate something intentionally and then try to genetically organisms, repair it. The only proper solution is to 1905, correctly master the album, period. The article What Happened to in black, Dynamic Range explains all of this in greater detail, this is a highly recommended read. There's an excellent YouTube movie that illustrates how music is destroyed by dynamic range compression. Also, take a look at the Turn Me Up! website. If you're still convinced that over-amplifying your albums to the point that the russia 1905 waveforms start clipping will give you an advantage over properly mastered albums on radio broadcasts, you may want to read this.

(1): Dynamic range compression is not to be confused with lossy compression as is used by digital audio codecs like MP3, AAC, and OGG, which is the lady in black, a completely different thing. Russia 1905! Dynamic range compression works on modified examples the amplitude of sound waves and alters the sound considerably. Lossy compression works on 1905 the digital data that represents the music, and only slightly alters the sound waves to modified, allow a digital representation that requires less storage space. Ideally those small alterations are not noticeable to the listener. (2): I actually tried undoing compression on the Doves song The Outsiders. My strategy was to do the russia 1905 inverse of a multi-band compressor, by splitting up the modified examples song into multiple frequency bands and trying to reconstruct realistic dynamics in 1905 each band. The latter is pure manual and wet-finger work.

To keep it tractable I only used three bands but even that did not save me from many, many hours sculpting amplitude envelopes. Parts of the to Win a War song did improve a lot, but the inevitable result was still that it sounds like someone is fiddling with the volume knob because three frequency bands is not enough. I would need to russia, use more bands to abraham in the, get a better result, and spend even more time on it. No matter what I would try, the result will always be much worse than if the song would have been properly produced from the russia 1905 start. Nevertheless, the immediate analysis original version now sounds even more flaccid to me because I got used to the extra dynamics.

(3): If you want to know what this sounds like, you can download a ZIP file with part of this sound. I reduced the volume to russia 1905, a normal level to avoid that you would blow up your speakers and ears. If you do believe this sounds awesome, put it on repeat and modified organisms examples play it for five minutes. Then play some normal music and see what sounds better. (4): You can download a sound fragment to hear how the music was massacred. It contains a fragment of the original version, followed by the same fragment from the 2006 compilation. Of course I normalised the volumes such that they sound equally loud.

Even on tinny laptop speakers you will notice that the 2006 version sounds jittery and distorted, especially around the beat.

Best Custom Academic Essay Writing Help & Writing Services UK Online - Russian Revolution - Wikipedia

Nov 16, 2017 Russia 1905,

Best Custom Academic Essay Writing Help & Writing Services UK Online - The 1905 Russian Revolution - History Learning Site

2017 eLearning Predictions: Updated Hype Curve. Russia 1905? Our 2016 hype curve was a big hit, so we#8217;re doing it again this year. Examples? Here is the short, graphical version: Our 2017 eLearning predictions set in terms of Gartner#8217;s hype cycle. And below the fold, the long version, broken into the five stages popularized by Gartner: As I wrote last year, #8220;Online learning lags behind other industries in 1905 adopting new technologies. This is not because people in online learning are not interested in who shot abraham in the new technologies; its because were not a high-revenue industry compared to russia giant industries like consumer goods.#8221; This is genetically modified organisms examples still as true as ever, and it explains why there#8217;s a four-to-eight-year lag between technology trends as a whole and their application in eLearning. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Our developer David Wipperfurth writes, #8220;AI and ML don#8217;t really fit well on 1905, the hype curve, because they will have multiple in/out fluxes with different technologies and uses. AI/ML is the lady in black essentially too big and russia vague a category to put on such a chart. It would be like asking where economics fits on the chart.#8221; OK, granted.

Writing specifically of small developing states, intelligent apps, David adds, #8220;This depends on what we#8217;re talking about. Flashcard applications and adaptive testing have been intelligent for years and years. Lots of people probably make claims about how #8216;intelligent#8217; their apps are. I#8217;d say adaptivity (outside of tests), procedural generation, and russia 1905 data mining are not widely utilized by mainstream pedagogy, so for those cases it might be at technology trigger.#8221; Following David#8217;s lead, we define artificial intelligence and machine learning as computer-generated algorithms, or #8220;procedural generation#8221;: the idea that the computer derives its own rules rather than relying on a human to program its rules. This kind of machine learning is used in applications like Google#8217;s speech recognition and translation software. The eLearning applications of this technology are very much in constituent their infancy; we expect them to be pioneered by 1905 firms like Google, IBM (which markets its Watson technology in organisms connection with various LMS platforms it has acquired over the years), Microsoft (which just invested in the lifelong learning space with its purchase of LinkedIn/Lynda), and even Amazon. We were surprised to find Amazon recruiting aggressively at 1905, the eLearning Guild#8217;s DevLearn conference. In short, eLearning applications of AI and ML are clearly in the Technology Trigger phase, but expected to continue to develop and mature in the next year. IMS Caliper: Caliper is the latest standard from to Win a War Essays, IMS. A newer standard than even xAPI, Caliper is russia somewhat less ambitious than xAPI in the number of use cases considered and APIs specified. This is a possible reason to expect quicker adoption.

Tim Martin of Rustici praised the Caliper design process at DevLearn. As Martin is one of the xAPI originators, this could foreshadow future synergies between the two standards and help xAPI get out of the Trough (see below). To understand the difference between the two standards, it#8217;s important to note that IMS and Caliper are driven by higher ed and thus of particular interest to the Educause crowd. IMS#8217;s best known standard, LTI, allows textbook companies to package online course content and Department ship it with their textbooks, regardless of the russia, implementing university#8217;s LMS. The Lady In Black? LTI packages vary from SCORM packages in that the typical content model follows higher education#8217;s synchronous, weekly, semester-long format rather than the asynchronous, one-time, hour-long format of much corporate and military training. Caliper keeps these use cases and 1905 users in mind while improving on abraham in the, previous IMS standards in the granularity of data captured and in use of an 1905, xAPI-like model for interoperability across multiple types of tools and platforms: mobile apps feeding back in to the LMS and the like. But the standard was only recently published, and application is still a work in progress. Internet-enabled Physical Simulators: There#8217;s not much more to add from what we said last year, other than that we#8217;ve participated in a pilot that used xAPI to connect a Laerdal simulator to a learning management system, and we#8217;ve read of another similar pilot. The use cases are clear, but the technology is not so easy to deal with right now. Standardized connectors need to be built. But because of the pilot activity, we#8217;re moving this trend up-slope a bit.

CHEST-Web Courseworks xAPI pilot. EHR-Integrated Performance Improvement: We have seen no real progress on the dream of integrating performance improvement education with electronic health records systems (EHRs). But the hype certainly increased in 2016 thanks to the long-awaited publication of the genetically organisms, final rule on quality payment under the Federal Medicare Access and 1905 CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). MACRA replaces the immediate constituent, old procedure-based Medicare payment formula with a complex new formula, called MIPS, that seeks to pay for quality. 1905? Part of the MIPS formula awards a bonus to clinicians for small developing states, participation in Clinical Practice Improvement Activities (CPIAs). CPIAs include MOC-IV and similar efforts to russia 1905 get clinicians to study their own practice, learn, and improve. Payment bonuses for quality and practice improvement represent a renewed regulatory emphasis on performance improvement. At quality conferences like IHI, the MACRA/MIPS hype is strong. Some solutions providers already claim MIPS compliance (we are skeptical). When providers claim to tie reporting for reimbursement into performance improvement metrics, we expect EHR-integrated performance improvement to reach the Peak of who shot head, Inflated Expectations. Virtual Reality in eLearning: VR might evoke a bit of deja vu in experienced eLearning observers, as we went very far down the simulation/avatar-y path a few years back: around 2006, Second Life was the talk of eLearning (it#8217;s not now).

Nonetheless, VR is something qualitatively different from 3D-animated, flat-screen computer games, and has been democratized by Google Cardboard and Samsung#8217;s Gear goggles. The presence of VR on the upward-sloping part of the curve was demonstrated at this year#8217;s DevLearn conference, where a number of vendors were demonstrating VR-based experiences. Russia 1905? The applications barely need to be elucidated: VR would be great for anything physical, including medical and technical skills. We#8217;ve blogged about an constituent analysis, application at Filament Games. 1905? As is often the case, the abraham in the head, popular adoption of VR is led by entertainment technology (gaming), and learning is still years behind. VR devices have low penetration in professional settings (have you got one in your office?). While the hype is, naturally, strong, VR is still perceived as a #8220;future thing#8221; by russia 1905 most in eLearning. Web Courseworks instructional designer Jenny Saucerman using HTC Vive. Subscription Learning: Subscription learning goes by many names, including spaced learning, but where we find it particularly hyped right now is in states the #8220;online continuous assessment#8221; model that has been popularized by the American Board of Anesthesiology. The basic idea of 1905, online continuous assessment is to do away with large, high-stakes certification exams that happen once every few years and replace them with a weekly or monthly exam question. Learners have time to digest the case-based questions and their feedback.

They might even apply what they learn from them in genetically examples their practice. This vision goes hand-in-hand with mobile delivery; learners are increasingly working on russia, these bite-sized chunks of assessment during gaps in their work days. The Lady? In our experience, most medical specialty boards are at least investigating mobile online continuous assessment, and many are actively searching for solutions providers. In a different, more commercial sense, subscription learning has been boosted by the collapse of the price point for 1905, on-demand learning. We#8217;re seeing organizations with large libraries of online learning that are interested in selling their content on immediate constituent analysis, a subscription model: the russia 1905, #8220;Netflix of self-paced learning#8221; approach exemplified by the lady in black OpenSesame. And finally we note that Coursera#8217;s nanodegrees (see MOOCs, below) are now sold on a monthly subscription model. In short, a lot of people are hanging their hopes on the simple idea of subscribing to learning. Expectations are a bit inflated. Data Visualization in eLearning: Nate Silver#8217;s The Signal and the Noise was published in 2012, and right about that time the 1905, market for self-service business intelligence software (Tableau, Qlik, Microsoft Power BI) went bonkers. Self-service BI software has democratized data visualization. Predictably, the trend has slowly disseminated outward from the higher-revenue parts of the enterprise to education, and we are now seeing constant talk about the need to offer administrative and learner-facing graphical dashboards to offer #8220;insights#8221; to designers and learners.

This trend is clearest in corporate eLearning, where the big corporate LMSes have colorful pie charts and histograms gratuitously flung all over The Will a War Essays their interfaces. Even Moodle, which is less commercial, now has a PowerBI plug-in. As with any technology at russia, the Peak of Inflated Expectations; be wary of the Letter of Entry College´s Department Essay, hype: remember that the trick with computers is always garbage-in, garbage-out. But do insist on better visualization capabilities from your learning software. Gamification: It#8217;s the proliferation of leaderboards that has landed Gamification (temporarily, we hope) in the trough of disillusionment. Many corporate LMSes offer leaderboards. They#8217;re easy to turn on, and also easy to misuse. The problem is 1905 that learners are being ranked on their completion of uninspiring SCORM modules. If learners feel they#8217;re being ranked arbitrarily, or that a training program is trying to the lady in black spice up low-quality learning with #8220;a little bit of competition,#8221; then they#8217;re going to find the leaderboard more annoying than motivating.

That being said, there#8217;s plenty of hope that gamification will pull through the trough and reach productivity relatively unscathed. The #8220;serious professional trivia#8221; model that we first encountered years ago with SCTE is achievable for most professional associations using available technology. The American College of Chest Physicians runs its CHEST Challenge competition in 1905 two phases: a first phase is administered online as a quiz in their LMS, and the second phase is immediate analysis a live #8220;quiz show#8221; format. The key to getting out of the Trough of Disillusionment is higher-quality, lower-cost content enabled by 1905 new tools, such as BranchTrack. xAPI: We are big believers in xAPI. We want to be clear on that. But every technology goes through a phase of disillusionment; that#8217;s the point of the hype curve. In the who shot in the head, case of xAPI, the disillusionment is around the continued difficulty in application. xAPI has not reached the #8220;plug and play#8221; productivity of SCORM. Speaking here as a member of the eLearning community, this is russia 1905 probably our own failure to genetically modified learn and adapt as quickly as we might like (hey, we#8217;ve got SCORM packages to 1905 finish).

But it#8217;s also pretty clear that the xAPI standard, in its flexibility and granularity, is ambitious, and it takes some time for ambitious standards like these to be absorbed into the lady in black, everyday practice. For now, it might seem as if xAPI is stuck in a #8220;perpetual piloting#8221; phase. But the pilots are proliferating we#8217;ve seen many more pilots in russia 1905 the last year than in the rest of the genetically modified, short history of russia 1905, xAPI put together. And that#8217;s a good sign: as more practitioners participate in pilots, understanding spreads, and xAPI moves upward toward the Slope of Enlightenment. MOOCs: We had MOOCs in the Trough of Disillusionment last year, and states indeed the russia 1905, hype has died down. Business models at the big MOOC platforms have shifted; both Coursera and Udacity are now pushing #8220;nanodegrees#8221; with a self-paced format. Letter To A Department? And their MOOCs are not entirely open anymore.

Many now cost money. Meanwhile, corporate MOOCs seem to have, essentially, fizzled. The #8220;enlightenment#8221; we#8217;re experiencing is best expressed by 1905 a recent quote from Udacity founder Sebastian Thrun, who told the New York Times, If I look back at the MOOC hype, what actually happened was that people equated a cheaper delivery method with the replacement of the entire educational system. A cheaper technology is who shot abraham lincoln in the head not the same as a business revolution.#8221; We agree: MOOCs should be seen as a valuable part of an russia, educational system that must serve an incredibly diverse range of learners and purposes. Educational institutions of all stripes shouldn#8217;t see them as a replacement for anything, but a tool that meets certain needs. Mobile Learning: Celebrate, for we#8217;ve finally reached the the lady, point where we can look back at the train-wreck that was the russia 1905, early days of mobile learning and laugh. There was the wrenching transition away from in black, Flash, the over-hyped hybrid apps, and the proliferation of unusable JQuery Mobile-based responsive websites (OK, some are still out there). We#8217;re past that now, or a good many of us are, and we#8217;re finally to the point where we can intelligently and productively use the various options available to us. Russia 1905? That pleasing, placid feeling of who shot abraham lincoln head, understanding and usability#8230;why, we must be on the Plateau of Productivity. Courtesy of The American Board of Anesthesiology, MOCA 2.0.

For more information on xAPI and the CHEST-Web Courseworks xAPI pilot, download our white paper. If you are interested in performance improvement, learn more about our Quality Improvement Education program (QIE). Web Courseworks#8217; received a Brandon Hall technology award for our QIE program in January. Adaptive learning system, virtual assistant, expert system, and eLearning management intelligence(one early case is building alerts from predictive learning analytics) will be major applications of AI/MachineLearning. Russia 1905? Observing the capital poured into it, I guess AI/ML will be advancing faster than xAPI. The issue of Letter of Entry to a Department, xAPI isn#8217;t about technology itself, it#8217;s about people silos that leads to data silos. I would love to see a table that shows all the new learning technology with these columns: What it is and what can it do.

Major benefits to learners. An implementation difficulty rating. Cost of implementation. Learning curve for end users. Skill sets needed as a developer/administrator. I think I#8217;m going to make one. I need to clearly see the cost benefit ratio before jumping on any bandwagons.

Association Learning Technologies eLearning Consultant, CEO of Web Courseworks. Dr. Jon Aleckson is an educational leader and 1905 consultant in association learning technologies and eLearning. He works with an extensive list of association clients on LMS implementation and development, platform alignment and integration, and in black online curriculum development, giving him a holistic view of 1905, business models, operational practices, and educational approaches in a War Essays association eLearning. Dr. Hicken has worked in russia eLearning since 2006.

He has been the lead instructional designer and, later, product innovation specialist on a number of projects, including the island developing, World Anti-Doping Agencys PlayTrue Challenge game, which won a silver award in the Games for russia, Good/Non-Profit category at the Serious Games Conference. Dr. Constituent? Hicken received his Ph.D. in ethnomusicology in 2009, and stays active in the field. Jenny Saucerman has worked in eLearning since 2011 with a focus on educational games and learning analytics. She earned her master's degree in russia educational psychology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2015.

She is the lady currently an russia, instructional designer for Web Courseworks.

Order Essay - Russian Revolution of 1905 | Britannica com

Nov 16, 2017 Russia 1905,

Pay for Exclusive Essay - The 1905 Revolution - Alpha History

Discrimination Against Youth Voice. Any honest conversation about Youth Voice must address the challenges that young people and adult allies face when they work to engage children and youth throughout our communities. By their very existence, Youth Voice programs are made to respond to these challenges; ignoring them is not being honest about the purpose of Youth Voice. Racism, sexism, classism, homophobia the list of challenges facing young people is enormous. However, one of the core challenges is a common experience that all people face early in russia, their lives. That challenge is discrimination against genetically modified organisms children and youth. Discrimination occurs anytime one thing is chosen before something else. That is often a good thing otherwise, why wouldnt we all steal our food instead of growing it or buying it?

We all discriminate everyday. However, discrimination often excludes people because of false bias or prejudice. Discrimination against children and youth is caused by the bias adults have for other adults that causes them to discriminate against russia young people. Bias for adults is called adultism. When something is based on adultism, it is called adultcentrism.While adultism is sometimes appropriate, adultcentrism is often inappropriate. A War Essays? Compulsory education can force students to disengage from the love of learning. Youth development programs can force youth to disconnect from adults. Almost every activity that is for young people is decided upon, developed, assessed and redeveloped without young people. 1905? That is adultcentrism. Language, programs, teaching styles, and immediate constituent, all relationships between young people and adults are adultcentric.

The most youth-friendly adults are often adultist, assuming that youth need them which, while it may be true, is still centered on adult perspectives. 1905? Adultism is not always harmful but adultism is always real. Adultism leads to a phenomenon of little adults young people who are adults-in-the-making, rather than children and youth today. Adultcentrism leads to manipulating and tokenizing young people through Youth Voice activities. Organisms? Despite the 1905 intention, that process often further disengages young people! Adultism exists for a lot of reasons, including beliefs about the abilities of young people, roles of different people throughout society, and the nature of society. Those beliefs have sometimes lead to the fear of children, called pedophobia, and the fear of youth, called ephebiphobia. These fears drive much of Letter to a College´s Financing Department Essay, society to segregate young people from adults, demonize youth in the media, and ostracize children from 1905, elders. Modified Organisms? These fears have filled our culture with double standards that constantly challenge Youth Voice.

Identifying different forms of discrimination against young people throughout our society is important. Following are some of those forms. Discrimination against Youth Voice in 1905, Language. Act your age. Children should be seen and not heard. What do you know, youre just a kid! Do as I say, not as I do. Youll understand it someday, just you wait. Discrimination against the lady in black Youth Voice in russia 1905, Youth Work.

Programs designed by Essays adults for youth without youth Isolation of russia, children and the lady in black, youth from adults Professional language does not allow youth to easily understand what is being done to 1905, them Evaluations engage adult staff and not youth participants. Discrimination against Youth Voice in School. Students are forced by law to attend schools that may not be effective Classroom learning relies on adults as sole-holders of knowledge Decisions about organisms examples, students, including learning topics, activities, punishments, budgeting and teaching methods are routinely made without students Adults routinely grade students without giving equal weight to students perspectives on their own academic achievement Double-standards in treatment, including when the belief that when teachers yell at russia 1905, students, they are controlling classrooms; when students yell at the lady in black, teachers, they are creating unsafe learning environments. Discrimination against Youth Voice in Communities. People under 18-years-old are virtual non-citizens without the right to vote or any tangible political representation and minimal influence Community problem-solving that routinely neglects youth members Business policies that allow for discrimination, such as Under-14s must be accompanied by adults, and russia 1905, Under-18s cannot be managers. Local laws that target youth, including anti-cruising and anti-graffiti laws Media bias against youth that alternatively portrays youth as apathetic super-predators who are obese, stuck on computers, gang members. How YOU Can Resist Discrimination Against Youth Voice.

There are many ways that young people and their adult allies can challenge adultism. Addressing discrimination against Youth Voice is a challenge that many young people and adult allies should take personally, especially when armed with meaningful strategies for The Will to Win, powerful action. Following are a few strategies for resisting adultism: Adults should strive to be a role model for other adults. Demonstrate in your own conduct and the way you talk that you oppose attitudes and behavior that debase, degrade, inflict injury on russia 1905 or promote animosity against to Win a War young people of all ages. Youth should get to know your adults, no matter where they are school, youth programs, the library, everywhere. Support those who actually show they care above all about young people, that they have integrity and russia, that they can be objective. Genetically Organisms? Insist that your youth program/classroom/religious community/organization sets high goals and expectations for adults, no matter what positions they are in, where they come from or how much education they have.

Carefully examine the media in your community. See if it is realistic, democratic, and free of adultist biases. If they are not, demand coverage that is. Insist that youth development, educational, and russia, behavior management practices be reviewed for effectiveness. These practices reveal what adults do not know, not what they do. Volunteer as an adult ally for analysis, a youth program or school. Talk with young people you know.

Listen to russia, them. Engage yourself in their lives as appropriate, and as you are capable. Provide literature and resources about Youth Voice to young people themselves. Tips for Addressing Discrimination Against Youth Voice. Advocating for and sharing Youth Voice throughout a community often means being prepared for just about anything on a moments notice. When facing adultism head-on, it can be important to to Win, be intentional in your efforts. Following are some tips when addressing adultism: Seek understanding by encouraging adults to russia, examine adultism. Explore the feelings adults have about young people. Youth and adults should work together to find the island source of frustration, resentment or treatment towards youth. Acknowledge anger and let youth and russia 1905, adults know that it is okay to feel anger but remind them they do not need to act out their anger towards young people.

Engage allies by asking an adult ally to address and explore adultism with other adults. If you are an adult trying to reach another adult, it can be powerful to bring young people directly into the picture. Remember that Youth Voice is for who shot abraham lincoln in the, everyone, and that in easy times and struggling times, Youth Voice should be hard. There will always be adults and behaviors that discriminate against youth, and working against that resistance is challenging for everyone. Russia 1905? You are not alone, and there are other people advocating for Youth Voice and struggling against adultism. Connect with others in your town, across Washington, and around the immediate constituent world because they are out there! Stay focused, no matter how pointed the adultism might seem. Stay calm and 1905, try not to take it personally. Address behaviors, structures, and other things that can be changed.

Create community by talking with others who challenge adultism, especially youth, even if it is just a brief comment or casual conversation. Examples? Adultism affects or has affected every single person in 1905, our society, and it takes persistence and teamwork to resist it. Other tools are out there, too share your thoughts in genetically modified, the comments below! For more information about 1905, how The Freechild Project can help support youth voice in your community or organization, contact us. I agree. The fact of the matter is, if I were to say something political or anything involving issues in the real world I would be told to lincoln in the, stay out of it. Russia? But if Hilary Clinton or Bernie Sanders said the exact same thing I said, they would be praised for it. To A Financing Department Essay? The cold truth is that if a younger person challenges a older persons political view or statement, the younger person 9 out of 10 times will be told they are just a child, or that they dont get it yet.

I dont know how many times I hear adults talking about things like Obama care or just president Obama in general, that are false. Thats not me saying their ideas are wrong, thats me literally saying that they say false things. For example I have heard an adult say that the United States found weapons of russia 1905, mass destruction in the middle east, which is of Entry to a Financing Essay, false. Im a democrat from Pennsylvania and my family moved down south so as you could imagine, I run into a lot of republicans. 1905? The thing is I cant challenge their views because they think I am too immature to say things about politics which is of Entry Department, just wrong. Please continue to work to russia, make sure we can end the discrimination against young peoples voices.

The voting age is who shot in the, 18 for a reason. It would not be appropriate to enfranchise young children or very young adolescents due to the fact that there is a tendency for russia, them to lack the ability to understand the long term ramifications of to Win, who they may vote for or how they voted. Russia 1905? Usually adults have more of the ability to understand the long term ramifications of how they voted or who they voted for. In Black? It would be inappropriate to abolish the voting age. I think its important to note that age and intelligence dont always correlate. There are several adults who are so misinformed, immature, and overall lack understanding of politics that they shouldnt be able to vote, but they do simply because they are over russia 1905 18. Meanwhile there are several young individuals below the age of 18 that are so knowledgeable in politics and have strong opinions that they wish to be heard, and the lady in black, are not able to do so. This is the case with a number of things. Ideally we wouldnt use age as a way to quantify what an individual is capable of but rather their overall maturity, regardless of russia, age. Of course certain things would be exceptions to this rule (ex. The Lady? age of consent) but overall I must disagree with you in thinking that adults have a better understanding of the long term ramifications.

Hey, lets try judging people by the content of their character okay? Most adults arent capable of understanding long-term consequences either, and their way of thinking is overly stubborn and russia, closed-minded. Who Shot Abraham Head? People, on russia average are not really smart, thoughtful or empathetic creatures, no matter what age group we look at. So instead of this faulty, age-limited voting system, there should be some kind of political aptitude test with no age limit. About the role of basic political institutions and such. You arent allowed to drive without a drivers license, or perform surgeries without a medical doctorate. So why should politics work differently?

Think of all political leaders nowadays that you know. More than half of them are completely inept and/or psychopaths. I guess thats a solid proof that being an adult by to a Financing Department itself doesnt make you capable of intelligent decision making. Also, (for 15 Alyx) I dont think age of consent laws are reasonable either. Just think of russia, it, if the child didnt consent, there are regular anti-rape laws for that case. If they did, why would you want to invalidate their choice? It is quite dehumanizing to disregard a anyones opinion so blatantly. Immediate Constituent? You ARE a rape victim! I dont care if you are in love! How does this sound? And while we are at it, down with the movie/game/website age restrictions too!

Thats anti-intellectualism under the sugary guise of preserving innocence. But what is innocence even? I think it means not being guilty. How is it guilty to watch/play/read bloody or sexual things. Russia? Sex is normal, no other living being is so ashamed of it as humans. Animals do it in genetically modified organisms examples, front of their kids! (Well, even I find that squicky, still its just a cultural thing) As for russia, the bloody stuff, kids can decide for themselves if they are scared of it or not. Sometimes I was too, but my parents always used to let me watch and play whatever I wanted. Yet I didnt turn out to be murderous or violent. (Thats usually the impact of domestic violence instead, which is ironically disregarded, and constituent, even accepted as a way of russia, parenting in too many countries) Anyway, its difficult to be young and opinionated And sorry for the rant, Im just happy that I found a website that cares about the discrimination of young people. #128512; What are the consequences of adultism? Adultism is sharing the common ground with domestic violence.

Can people use free child. Org as a good argument to protect the children in family court for the judge to be aware of the lady, whats going behind closed door. Using The Freechild Project website is your call there are few citations on the site and 1905, its largely conjecture and inference. However, the Letter Financing Essay website is cited repeatedly in academic, psychological and popular media around the world. I explore the consequences of adultism extensively in my 2015 book called Facing Adultism Id suggest you check it out at http://amzn.to/2sfcU0k.

@22, but still a kid at heart #128521; In regards to consent laws, here in 1905, CT (and most places) its set at 16. If an 8 year old consents to sexual acts, it would not be appropriate. Lincoln Head? Removing age of consent laws paves way for sexual acts with children, which I could only hope you do not find okay. If you do believe that there should be an age set to prevent this, then that is russia, still age based consent. The Will To Win A War? (note there is exceptions in individuals close in age, or married). As for russia, movie/game/website restrictions, these do not exist. The Lady In Black? It is russia, not illegal for a minor to access porn online, you can see an R rated movie with parental permission or someone who is older (there is also the internet), and ESRB ratings are pretty fair. The Will To Win? The majority of games fit under E for everyone, 10+, or teen. If you really wanted a game rated M it is not illegal nor against the law in the US. You can again, easily buy it online, or for many places in person.

It deeply concerns me that you believe it is russia, entirely fine for kids to be exposed to Letter of Entry to a College´s Financing Department, certain things at such a young age. This is russia 1905, not anti-intellectualism under the sugary guise of analysis, preserving innocence. One thing is watching a documentary about animals that happens to have mating, or learning about a world war that inevitably is russia, going to have violence, but you are talking about website, movies, and island states, video games that are rated that for russia, content such as gore, drugs, alcohol, and strong sexual themes. Things that are not benefiting them in the slightest. Kids do not need to be exposed to this, especially via these mediums which tend to to Win, overglorify such things. 1905? Again, one thing is watching a quality film (Such as Hayao Miyazakis Spirited Away) in which the in the character Yababa is seen smoking and it would be unfair for a child not to watch it on the basis of this. If the parent had a problem, they could just watch it and explain the dangers of smoking afterword. It is entirely different from 1905, playing GTA or watching some inappropriate adult comedy filled with sexual innuendo and drugs. I think you have forgotten the the lady in black role of a parent and are somehow under the belief that kids (and as an extent teens) should be almost entirely self regulatory. Parent derives from russia 1905, a latin root meaning to bring forth. It is there job to supply them with the necessary skills and knowledge to grow, thrive, and a War, bring them forth as adults that will make the russia world better.

The same way you are what you eat, you are what you feed your mind. Senselessly exposing it it to in black, certain things will negatively your outlook on the world. Dont be so quick to assume the things you see have no affect. That goes for everyone, regardless of age. Hey Alex, and russia 1905, thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, I think youre wholly missing the point of my page here. Rather than presuming that Im talking about a world without parents, I challenge you to consider a world with young people as equitable members of society.

Equity not equality is the key here. While its absolutely true that adults (parents especially) have specific roles throughout our society, I believe its important to see that children and analysis, youth have roles too, and given the changing nature of our society, those need to transform. Rather than being seen and treated as the passive recipients of adult-driven households, schools, governments and 1905, culture, all young people everywhere must be repositioned as active co-creators throughout all of the institutions that define where we live, how we live, and what we do throughout our lives. That re-definition should include new opportunities to a War, lead, teach and russia, learn with adults as partners. This doesnt mean taking anything away from parents; it means re-conceptualizing what our expectations are for ourselves and others. Thats what The Freechild Project is about acknowledging that indeed, parents have important positions and who shot abraham in the, that young people do, too. Its not either/or, its both/and. Thanks again for your comment. @Adam Fletcher I understand and agree with that notion entirely. It is 1905, 22, but still a kid at heart ;) that my comment was directed at. Letter Of Entry Financing Essay? Im just a bit confused/concerned about 1905, some of the who shot abraham in the head statements he/she is making.

As someone with the face of a fifteen year old trapped in russia 1905, a 19 year olds life, I can testify that Ageism is the lady in black, a huge factor in many aspects of my life including employment opportunities, work situations, public interactions, and conversations with adults, especially parents. Russia 1905? I work at a camp and because of how young I look, the parents are reluctant to leave their child in my care and genetically modified organisms examples, therefore the kids tend to ignore my authority, I cant really fault them because their own parents just discredited my right to russia 1905, lead when they asked if I was old enough to be left alone with children. My judgement is constantly undermined by The Will parents and many adult figures. Russia? The other day I was flying home from college and in black, (after a gate agent had tried to get me to board as a minor who needed a babysitter) an elderly man seated next to me instructed me to buckle up as we were sitting waiting for people to board the plane. I didnt buckle immediately because 1) We werent moving 2) I had the middle seat and someone would eventually have to get to their window seat and 3) I was 19 years old and russia, Id buckle when I damn well pleased or if the seat belt sign was on. What bothered me though, was that had I looked a few years older, this old coot would have shut his mouth and buckled himself in abraham head, if he felt a seat belt was necessary at that time.

Instead, the man felt that I was incapable of making the right judgement regarding the seat belt and felt the need to exert his dominance over russia me. Had I been in middle school I would have buckled my belt but as a college student; I worked minimum wage jobs to pay this mans social security so he and the lady, his decomposing wife could spend their last summers in RV taking up parking space at 1905, Yellowstone. The worst part was, I buckled the belt anyways because thats what I had been taught to abraham lincoln, do, listen to adults and not question their authority. Then theres the public situations, like I turn into a category 5 criminal if Im at a park after sunset or the russia 1905 sign that says Kids under 18 cant carry a bag into our store. as if the lincoln 18 and under crowd are the russia only people who steal, and so help me god If I want to apply for a job. Genetically Modified? The job front is the hardest because no one wants to take orders from russia, a little girl so I can rule out The Will a War, any management opportunities, secondly, if I work as a hostess or bartender I need to look the part which Im sure is true for russia 1905, a lot of modified organisms examples, jobs, and finally, age equals experience so when I look like Im fifteen, people automatically assume I dont know or understand jack squat. Lastly, my parents.

Were in this awkward limbo of Im an adult but they still cant see it. I work, cook, clean, pay bills, watch other peoples children, drive, vote, drink, have sex, and I havent been arrested and yet Im treated like a convicted criminal. I have a curfew, a to-do list, ridiculous repercussions for my actions like being sent to my room, my feelings are automatically invalidated as trivial or a temper tantrum or childish and my reactions and actions are always taken into question like my parents are a higher power when the two of them arent exactly standing on the moral high ground. Ill never forget my mothers face when I said something smart about my parents divorce: my father: Youre in russia, trouble because you werent honest. me: So when you were screwing that whore in genetically organisms examples, Canada without telling anyone, was that honesty? Its like being an 1905 adult allows people to the lady, forget what being hypocritical is and russia 1905, gives them the ability to criticize the young people and target millennials for things that their generation started or took part in. Ex. Island Developing States? Bill Gates Kids these days, always on their phones. Ashley Madison Accounts / Divorce Rates Kids these days just have sex with anyone.

Global Warming / Environmental Issues Kids these days, wasting water and russia, electricity. The media uses millenials as scapegoats and the under 18 population, as non-voting, non citizen party, is College´s Department, forced to russia 1905, not be taken seriously as the media bashes them without representation. The mission of The Freechild Project is to engage young people in social change. The Lady? Our services include: All content 2017 The Freechild Project. All rights reserved. MAIL: The Freechild Project, PO Box 6185 Olympia, WA USA 98507-6185.

PHONE: +1 (360) 489-9680. Freechild is a program of CommonAction, an russia independent education consulting firm. For more information, including permissions, please contact us.